I like the concept of straight pieces of cloth between the struts in order to keep an optimal curve in your cloth, even if the kite is too far down. I also find the turning very unnecessary to use 50% of it since kites turn so fast that it loses a lot of power (in theory, not tested, but you already saw it with the bowkites, turning actually too fast no power is built up in the curves) even c-shapes have been running so tightly for so long that you don't have to improve a lot I think. So the restart works less in practice than in theory. This seems to be purely due to the angle of the le in the wingtip that immediately “grabs” more water, pulling the rest in. What struck me during my work (kite instructor on oostvoorne) that when a sigma shape crashes the tip just pulls the rest of the kite into the water as it were (so it crashes), while you used to go through the c-shape and bow with a wingtip the water could pop without crashing it. I have always been very interested in aerodynamcia and think they look a lot like a gull wing (and they seem to me to be the most efficient wings) Reactions and practical experiences are welcome. This makes a Sigma shape kite easily overturn. The leading edge no longer sticks to the water over the entire width, but has two tilting points on the sides of the kite. The Sigma shape should make water starting a lot easier because the kite, once it is on the water, only has contact with the water at two points. As a result, the bar pressure must also remain fairly constant. This ensures that the kite remains in place even with extreme depower and does not suddenly shoot forward. In the image you can see that the round in the sigma kite remains at the same point, even with extreme depower. The Sigma shape must reduce the bar pressure, provide the kiteboarder with a constant pressure and the kite must not suddenly gain enormous speed when depowering. This 30% must get the other 70% of the kite, this causes a delay.īar pressure and position of the kite when depowering With a conventional kite, Naish assumes that direct control at 30% is at the 'tips' of the kite. The image shows that the Sigma shape kite is directly controlled over 50% of the kite with steering corrections. The Sigma shape must increase the rotational speed. The objectives that Naish has with these kites can be clustered in three main objectives that are detailed below. The Sigma shape is now entering its second year and is designed by the kiteboard manufacturer Naish kiteboarding. You have probably seen these kites, informed or perhaps you even kitesurf with them. This year, the Sigma shape is indispensable. Not so much because it is one Supported Leading Edge (SLE) kite is only more because of the non-conventional shape of the kite. In 2007, the Sigma shape was still an odd man out among the existing types of kites.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |